09/23: In class writing

Cross-cultural differences in argumentation may be explained by the use of different standards ways of reasoning. These norms varies and differ from one person to another, despite the facts that the world is trying to make them universal. As Karaslaan, H., Hohenberger, A., Demir, H., Hall, S., & Oaksford, M. (2017). Cross-cultural differences in informal argumentation: norms, inductive biases and evidentiality. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 18(3-4)358. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321462518_Cross-Cultural_Differences_in_Informal_Argumentation_Norms_Inductive_Biases_and_Evidentiality says ” This inconsistency can be resolved, by considering that some norms of argumentation, like Bayes theorem, are mathematical functions. ” Therefore, using certains norms as mathematics functions we can infer that they are correct.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Viewing Message: 1 of 1.
Warning

Important: Read our blog and commenting guidelines before using the USF Blogs network.