Speech: Elie Wiesel – The Perils of Indifference
- An attention-getting opening
- Wiesel does a good job of starting off his speech with a story because in this way not only is he setting up the basis of his speech in a creative way, but his story will further catch and retain the audience’s attention more than had he just gone straight into the speech.
- An introduction (which includes a thesis statement / proposition of fact, value or policy).
- The introduction in this speech would be when Wiesel defines what indifference is and then goes into giving examples as to why people choose to remain indifferent in certain situations, even though choosing to remain indifferent is actually more harmful than people may realize.
- A body preview.
- The body portion of this speech would be when Wiesel starts talking about how indifference isn’t beneficial to anybody and actually produces more harm than good because of the sole fact that when one chooses to remain indifferent in the face of dire situations, they are actually harming those who are the victims by ignoring their suffering.
- Three or four main points (with transitions between them).
- Point 1: Indiffrence is much harmful than we realize because it is actually helping the aggressor
- Point 2: Choosing to remain indifferent esspecally when you see others suffering greatly is inhumane
- Point 3: Indifference towards a certain subject matter can actually end something so quickly before there is even a chance to have an opinion and fix the issue.
- Aristotelian persuasive techniques (including ethos, pathos, and logos)
- “Wrapped in their torn blankets they would sit or lie on the ground staring vacantly into space unaware of who or where they were, strangers to their surroundings. They no longer felt pain, hunger, thirst. They felt nothing, they were dead and did not know it” (5:41-7:23)
- This quote is a form of pathos because the imagery used evokes a deep sense of pity for these people and the situation they were placed in.
- “Wrapped in their torn blankets they would sit or lie on the ground staring vacantly into space unaware of who or where they were, strangers to their surroundings. They no longer felt pain, hunger, thirst. They felt nothing, they were dead and did not know it” (5:41-7:23)
- A conclusion (which summarizes main points, and ends with a call to action).
- ” This time the world was not silent. This time we do respond. This time we intervene” (18:17)
- Ends off speech with talking about how the U.S can/is currently helping those who are in need of it most, and not only is it important for the government to be involved, but the rest of humanity must also care about those suffering around them and lend a helping hand in whatever way that they can.
- ” This time the world was not silent. This time we do respond. This time we intervene” (18:17)
How do you think this example may be helpful during the process of creating your own video speech?
This speech was a really profound example of argumentation and provided me with tactics I will implement in my own speech in order to make a more effective presentation. Something that stood out to me that I will definitely be drawing inspiration from is Wiesels’ integration of his moving personal experiences, which lend hand to both pathos and credibility, overall leading to a great speech that surely moved his entire audience to taking a call to action.