Understanding Proposition 4: California’s $10 Billion Plan for a Greener Future
In the recent election, California voters were presented with several propositions on the ballot. Among these was Proposition 4, which aimed to “authorize bonds for safe drinking water, wildfire prevention, and the protection of communities and natural lands from climate risks.” This legislative measure was placed on the ballot by the legislature, garnering support from CALFIRE Firefighters and the National Wildlife Federation while facing opposition from the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.
Proposition 4 authorizes the state to borrow $10 billion through general obligation bonds to fund efforts like improving water supply, preventing wildfires, and protecting communities from climate risks. While this ambitious plan comes with a long-term cost of about $400 million annually over 40 years to repay the bond, the potential benefits for California’s environment and infrastructure are substantial.
Voters faced a clear choice: a ‘YES’ vote allowed the state to move forward with these critical projects, while a ‘NO’ vote meant rejecting the borrowing plan and its associated initiatives. On November 5, Californians decided to say ‘YES,’ passing the measure with a strong 59.8% of the vote—totaling nearly 9 million votes. This decisive outcome sets the stage for significant investment in the state’s climate resilience.
With Proposition 4 now approved, the big question is: what’s next? The measure authorizes $10 billion in funding for environmental projects, with a focus on supporting lower-income communities and those most vulnerable to climate change. But how exactly will this money be used, and what projects will it fund?
The proposition outlines a clear plan for distributing the funds across eight broad categories, each targeting specific environmental and climate goals. In addition to this, there are important guidelines governing how the funds are used. For instance, at least 40% of the bond money is required to support projects that benefit lower-income communities or those most at risk from climate change. Furthermore, the proposition mandates regular public reporting to ensure transparency in how the funds are being spent. This will ensure that the needs of communities will be met. Together, these investments aim to strengthen California’s environmental resilience, enhance public safety, and ensure that vulnerable communities are prioritized.
The 8 categories of spending provide a roadmap for how this significant investment will address California’s pressing challenges. Below is a breakdown of the spending plan, showcasing the state’s priorities for creating a more sustainable and resilient future.
1. Drought, Flood and Water Supply – $3.8 billion
$1.9 billion: Increasing the quantity and quality of water supply
EX. Storing water to be used in future droughts
EX. Cleaning polluted water to make it safe to drink
$1.1 billion: Flood reduction measures
EX. repairing dams
EX. capturing and reusing stormwater
$800 million: River and lake restoration
2. Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention – $1.5 billion
EX. thinning trees in overgrown forests
Ex. clearing vegetation near where people live
EX. helping homeowners make their properties more resistant to wildfires
3. Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Areas – $1.2 billion
$890 million: Restore coastal areas
EX. restoring wetlands to serve as natural buffer to rising sea levels
$310 million: Improve ocean habitats and marine wildlife
4. Land conservation and habitat restoration – $1.2 billion
EX. supporting the purchase of land to ensure it remains underdeveloped
5. Energy infrastructure – $850 million
$475 billion: Wind turbine development
EX. developing wind turbines off the California Coast
$325 million: Transmission lines
EX. improving system to carry electricity long distance
$50 million: Battery development
EX. building large batteries to store electricity for when needed
6. Parks – $700 million
$300 million: Expand recreational activities
EX. adding new trails and parking areas
$200 million: Park construction and renovation
EX. providing grants to local communities
$200 million: State park repairs
EX. providing nature education
7. Extreme Heat – $450 million
$200 million: Extreme heat protection
EX. adding trees and greenspaces to protect communities
$100 million: Heatwave and disaster shelters
EX. providing support places for people to escape the heat
$150 million: Local environmental projects
EX. reducing air pollution
8. Farms and agriculture – $300 million
$105 million: soil health, reduce air pollution, and water conservation
$60 million: Community gardens and farmer’s markets
EX. purchasing shade canopies
$135 million: Farmland and farmworker support
EX. purchasing vans to transport farmworkers
EX. conserving farmland
Together, these eight spending categories demonstrate a holistic approach to addressing California’s environmental and climate challenges. By targeting areas such as wildfire prevention, extreme heat mitigation, and energy infrastructure, Proposition 4 invests in both immediate needs and long-term solutions. Importantly, the measure prioritizes lower-income and climate-vulnerable communities, ensuring that the benefits of these initiatives reach those most in need. These investments represent a critical step forward in safeguarding California’s natural resources and promoting equity across the state.
As Proposition 4 moves from approval to implementation, California is poised to make significant strides in addressing climate risks and improving environmental sustainability. The carefully planned allocation of funds offers a blueprint for tackling some of the state’s most pressing challenges, from securing safe water supplies to protecting vulnerable communities from wildfires and rising sea levels.
However, this is just the beginning. The success of these initiatives will depend on effective project execution, transparency in fund management, and ongoing public engagement. With at least 40% of the funds directed toward lower-income and climate-vulnerable communities, Proposition 4 has the potential to not only transform California’s environmental landscape but also to promote equity and resilience statewide.
As these projects unfold, it’s critical for all of us to stay informed and involved, ensuring that this historic investment truly makes a difference for California’s future.