Today, I read Lexi and Samuel’s posts. After reading Lexi’s post, I realize that we both have many similarities about what we have received from the readings. For instance, both of us mentioned how Chapter 4 of the book, Everything’s an Argument, is telling the readers how to analyze logos and how to use them to support one’s argument. We also mentioned the main purpose of Caleb Wong’s essay which is about people’s addiction to social media. I found Lexi’s post interesting because I didn’t think about Wong’s flaws in his essay. Lexi mentioned that even though Wong delivers a strong claim, she feels like “he may have lost the interest of [some] readers” because his paper is “filled with purely facts and statistics”. I didn’t see Samuel’s post.