Overall my speech went pretty well; I covered a good amount of material that I had lined up to talk about and kept my facts straight. I did get a little ahead of myself at times and came back to certain points because of it, and I think this is why I wound up with some extra dead air at the end. I think I hit a lot of good points and covered what I wanted to do but wish I had hit some things about personal experience like I had planned, but my train of thought got thrown off from the start so oh well. I think I had good voice projection and eye contact with the audience, and I tried to keep it light enough to be relatable and easy to understand for everyone. I talked about the different types of credibility discussed in the articles we read in relation to different legalities of critical mass, but I wish I went a little more in depth on this topic. The concept of perceived credibility was supposed to be the center of my talk, but the background of the ride got in the way of expanding on its credibility.