By Victoria S. Kolakowski*
Click here for the PDF Version.
Introduction
One of the joys and hazards of teaching a class on cutting-edge constitutional law issues is that the U.S. Supreme Court can surprise us with decisions that take unexpected paths.
This occurred in the summer of 2021 when the Court issued its opinion in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia and did not address a crucial issue queued up by the parties: whether the Court would directly address the holding of Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith.[1] I prepared the syllabus of my course, “Equality and Religious Freedom,” with the expectation that Fulton would be the capstone and finally announce the new legal regime in religious freedom. This essay addresses the history of Smith, why the Court deferred taking Smith head-on in Fulton, and what the Court might choose to do in the future.