By Bill Ong Hing on September 25, 2022
Click here for PDF Version.
Introduction
Thirty-five years ago, I was fortunate to be part of the litigation team that won big before the U.S. Supreme Court in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca,[1] the case that established that asylum applicants “need not prove that it is more likely than not” that they will be persecuted in their home countries in order to prevail.[2]
Continue reading “Turn Asylum on its Head and Presume Eligibility”