Rachel and Ashley
How can rhetorical practices be attuned to local cultures and their diverse knowledge making practices? In light of the methodologies such as “training cultural impacts,” and “digital ethnography” (adopted by Maher & Getto), what effective measures can be adopted by technical and professional communication scholars to create and disseminate knowledge from diverse places and cultures?
- A recent example of local culture and diversity is the use of face masks. Asian people have been using face masks for several decades no matter if there is an outbreak. Now that there is a “justified’ reason for mace masks, it is not seen as a silly miscellaneous thing, but a necessary item.
- Understanding context is important…. Context can help to view knowledge about diverse places and cultures in objective light … or from a universal perspective rather than just a western perspective.
- Implementation of “intercultural connectivism” which uses “student personal learning networks or (PLNs) “as a means of operationalizing culture in social contexts by making visible the learners’ cultural orientation to knowledge, information, and learning, and by so doing, potentially expanding the learners’ intercultural competence” (p. 30). So intercultural connectivist method of teaching (through the use of networks) seeks to encourage collaborative knowledge-making across cultural, technological, and individual boundaries. So in other words, Intercultural connectivism helps to broaden students cultural context
- Students in the implementation of methodologies in both religious studies and the digital humanities and curating information that integrates the students’ individual efforts with his or her comprehensive study of the sacred mapping of Buddhism. When engaged in intercultural inquiry of this kind, it is essential to adopt an appropriate level of scaffolding that fosters maximum student engagement with multiple Cultures without generating significant student resistance to this engagement.